Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on email
Email

RTC dismisses complaints vs. Negros Power, CENECO board

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on email
Email

• GILBERT P. BAYORAN

The complaint filed against the Prime Electric Holdings Incorporated (PEH), Negros Electric Power Corporation (NEPC), and the Central Negros Electric Cooperative (CENECO) has been dismissed by Negros Occidental Regional Trial Court Branch 79 presiding Judge Ferdinand Elbert Jomilla, for lack of cause of action.

Joaquin Dagohoy Malacad filed a complaint in June 22 last year, requesting the court to issue an order permanently enjoining CENECO, Prime Electric Holdings Inc., and NEPC from executing the Joint Venture Agreement, aside from calling for the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order from conducting a plebiscite and ratifying the JVA.

Malacad claimed that CENECO president and its directors lacked the authority to sign and approve the JVA between them and NEPC, and that holding the plebiscite is illegal, claiming that it violates the voting rights of the electric cooperative members.

Judge Jomilla had dismissed the request for issuance of TRO for lack of merit.

In response to the complaint of Malacad, CENECO said it enjoys the powers and corporate existence akin to those of a corporate entity, subject to the review and supervision of the National Electrification Administration, including authority and power that may be exercised by the President of the Board of Directors.

The JVA is also aimed at assisting CENECO in addressing its financial crisis, rehabilitating its decaying assets, and modernizing its distribution systems, it added.

On the other hand, the Prime Electric Holdings Inc. and NEPC said that the effectiveness of JVA shall be subject to the approval of CENECO member-consumers and concurrence of the NEA.

Judge Jomilla said he noted that the defendants raised in their respective answers that the plaintiff (Malacad) did not first file nor seek the resolution of the matter with the NEA, prior to initiating the action in court, thereby violating the doctrines of administrative remedies and primary jurisdiction.

The non observance of the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies resulted in the complaint having no cause of action, he pointed out.

Under the doctrine of primary administrative jurisdiction, if an administrative tribunal has jurisdiction over a controversy, courts should not resolve the issue, even if it may be within its proper jurisdiction. This is especially true when the questions involve its sound discretion requiring special knowledge, experience, and services to determine technical and intricate matters of fact, Judge Jomilla further said.

It has been the jurisprudential trend to apply the doctrine of primary jurisdiction in many cases involving matters that demand the special competence of administrative agencies. It may occur that the Court has jurisdiction to take cognizance of a particular case, which means that the matter involved is also judicial in character. However, if the case is such that its determination requires the expertise, specialized skills and knowledge of the proper administrative bodies because technical matters, or intricate questions of facts are involved, then relief must first be obtained in an administrative proceeding before a remedy can be supplied by the courts, even though the matter is within the proper jurisdiction of a court, he also said.

Wherefore, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for lack of cause of action, Judge Jomilla added.

The CENECO board of directors is composed of Jojit Yap, Ariel Guides, Eugenio Velasco, Antonino Panique, Dwight Carbon, Noel Alarcon, and Nicanor Jison, while the Prime Electric Holdings Inc. and NEPC are represented by Roel Castro.*

ARCHIVES

Read Article by date

May 2024
MTWTFSS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Get your copy of the Visayan Daily Star everyday!

Avail of the FREE 30-day trial.